User blog comment:Icon1994/New Team Members=New Mentors/@comment-24.212.209.183-20121227023115/@comment-34954086-20121228102412

1.They include someone with such strong focus, they consider him important to the plot. Duh. Can think of several posts where Greg'd simply say that they include what they need to to tell a good story.

2.Your mutual knowledge idea makes Zero sense. They is only one timeline... That's kind of the entire problem you see with the future..

They'd replace him in significance if they'd be brought in, if they're needed to fix what he can't, they do what he can't. They do his job, they replace him.

3. I don't prescribe to that. You see that as the only option, I do not. My theories hold even though those questions (which I give you a 80% certainty that they will be given Spoiler Request:No Comment.) may be given a no. My theories don't Need circumstances such as those to be in play they simply need narrative theory, yours while highly technical, require such specific concepts to hold (several of which have been found to be incorrect), and the more episodes pass, the thinner the window for time traveling eleventh hour rangers to come save the day becomes.