User blog comment:Sophiegaft/Could this happen?/@comment-67.248.244.174-20121222203030/@comment-34954086-20121223220403


 * You mean you? your IP address is public, you're the original poster. Anonymity is a falsehood, especially on this wiki, we check IP addresses of practically all anons. So...you're admitting to trolling?
 * I ran your IP before I posted originally, not only was it it's first post, but I've never dealt with troublesome anons from your location before.
 * We weren't talking to you anymore. We'd clearly moved on from talking to you and started discussing with Zergrinch, that's what we do in a community, we commicate with each other. If we ignore everybody and just keep to ourselves, the fandom doesn't truly exist.
 * Anons as a whole aren't wrong, we've had a fair few respected users, Bantha, Keet, EyeoftheAbyss, CacklingShadow, to name a few, begin their contributions as anons. It's just they aren't idiot-mongering, which you accuse yourself of doing.
 * Some of us do bash each other's theories, we enjoy arguing intellectually, it's called public scrutiny. A necessary step in the scientific process where a theory is tested by it's peers.
 * I don't stand by and allow idiocy. That's part of what's wrong with the world. People allow idiots, they ignore them instead of stopping them. This may hit close to home, but imagine if the idiot with a gun with Conneticut was stopped, educated that what he was doing would be the biggest mistake of his life. People who knew him weren't surprised by his actions so they could have predicted it, if you predict a stupid action, I consider it your duty as a homosapien (sapien=intelligent) to do your best to prevent it. Your post could have stirred some people into an entirely wrong train of thought. It could have caused problems for us later when people start spreading it I saw a rummer on YJwiki, Wally's a Clone!!. By stamping it outright, people see that it's invalid. Saves problems down the line.