User blog comment:Oknight/Superboy and Superman/@comment-1747822-20110314055727/@comment-3465526-20110320015051

Supermorff, I don't think genetics determines inter-personal relationships and in your thought experiment, the clone would be her adopted daughter-- the woman would be just as much her mother as Ma Kent was Superman's mother. But the point is, Superman HASN'T raised the baby. And he's not, in any sense, his father. Since Byrne's era, several versions of Superman have dealt with this EXACT situation -- Conner is Bizarro, with a somewhat better complexion and better diction. Now I agree, Clark is being rather a dick here -- usually Superman is VERY concerned that a clone of himself (or even someone who just gets his powers) learns the important lessons and responsibilities involved in being super-human (you should be careful not to shred that baby) so I don't really know what's going on with this version of Superman