Board Thread:Young Justice News/@comment-34954086-20130506143410/@comment-47881-20130511234855

Cari1994 wrote: I'm sorry; it must have been a typo when you said that you would let people make up their minds if PayPal makes a statement. If not, then I suggest (suggest being emphasized) that you think carefully before saying such things. As I said, words are more powerful than you think. Not a typo, just your warped interpretation. Zerg asked me what I would do if PayPal issued a statement to which I enumerated three things: Thailog wrote: I already said: I'll gladly shut the F up, let people make up their minds and put a link (with a caveat) on the main page. This is very different from "not wanting to let people make up their minds" which is tantamount to "wanting to dissuade people from pledging". Learn to read. Cari1994 wrote: I'm sorry; it must have been a typo when you said that you would let people make up their minds if PayPal makes a statement. If not, then I suggest (suggest being emphasized) that you think carefully before saying such things. As I said, words are more powerful than you think.

And regardless of intentions, pessimism naturally will be at least partially responsible for this project's failure. It's one of the biggest factors that would keep people from donating. It's only logical to think that way.

And this is not only my opinion as you can see from Livemage's posts. Oh, two people believe in the same thing (one that you happened to influence), then it must be a general truth.

And it's only logical if you want it to suit your theory. If that helps you soothe your conscience, then blame whomever you want, but just know that unfounded accusations and mudslinging will not go unpunished.