Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-47881-20120918132608/@comment-34954086-20121006031306

Zergrinch wrote: Regulus22 wrote: Zergrinch wrote: Ah, but we don't have any on-screen proof of Hugo Strange actually being a villain. He can always claim incompetence without malice.

Yeah we do, when he watches overshoulder as Ivo warned "morrow" of heroes coming to arrest him for criminal actions (home invasion at best), that'd count as a aiding and abetting (sp) or conspiracy at least You're right, so I will clarify. The Justice League has no on-screen proof (no audio-visual evidence, no histrionics from our good psychologist) that Strange is evil. He can easily defend himself by claiming to be hoodwinked by his charges.

Hence why they've not arrested him, (or Luthor for that matter) and been done with them. However, they know that they are villains, so a familial connection between the nutty scientist and the scheming psychologist may be cause for concern among some of them