User blog comment:Regulus22/Hated Characters./@comment-5062647-20120624091326/@comment-34954086-20120629225256

sci·en·tif·ic meth·od Scientific method, with the parts you fail to do boldened. You refuse to obverse sources that contradict your initial hypothesis, fail to acknowledge that testing/proposition of your hypothesis that shown you to be dead wrong, and fail to modify your hypothesis to correct your-shall-we-say-shortcomings. I dont think i know better then everyone, but i actually do this for a living

Yep what i thought, you cant name a single flaw in the evidence because you stopped even looking at it because you decided that we are all in a conspiracy against you. It's not the defenses' job to try and refute evidence, its the prosecution (you).

Some people cant pronouce bomb, but i think arisia's quite a pretty name, girlfriend agrees.

It takes zero effort from me to argue with you, im used to discussing things with evidence, referencs and theroies with other physicists, compared to them you're a toddler. (and i mean that in the friendly uncle capacity, not the parents actually looking after them ;) ) plus that said if you are to tired of the arguments with me and other users if you read it properly which you dont seem to bother with anymore, what you've said you have been on several discussions now.

@Giganta: Should know, females dont speak to matthew and he doesnt believe in the dawn of the decade phenomena of girls on the internet, so by that logic you'd need to be a male. Also NZ/ICBINA? no comprehension of "depth of meaning"