Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-34954086-20120922085545/@comment-34954086-20120924065434

Ok gotta ask, what do you do to know so much? harris-benedict certainly doesnt get done from a typical level of personal interest lol. Anyway deal with additional notes first.

7. Yeah I saw that, kinda made me wonder about how he didnt now she was a Queen and all,

9: I'd go fried chicken, looks like KFC to me.

Rest: Am I the only one getting kindof hungry right now? Well at least that gives a bit more Calorie count to work with then pancakes.

3: Wet Snow value is unless the temperature is significantly low, a layer of water forms on top between things, in the case of someone moving mach 1, the heat'd have to be great enough to melt the ice beneath his feet.

. His cupboads last 24 hrs, so there's enough Calories to account for geneal expenditure and not much more, should be able to determine caloric density from that. volume approx 1.5 litres/1.5E-3 m^3 max. mass no discernable effect although with such high work rate It's probably not reliable though i'd estimate about 2.5 kg for them together alone. his suit'd need to be dense as kevlar ,1.44 relative, *100 Water density, 1440. , 2 m^2 approximate surface area coverage, say 1.5 cm thick average at least. volume=0.03~ m^3., p=m/v, m=pv, 43 kg for suit alone, sans additional equipment and electricals.... We'll pretend they're some of serling roquette's brilliant science so we can ignore their mass. recalculating normal force=12.75, frictional force=38 N,*metres, 4914E3 m, E=187,975,242 J, 44927 Calories. essentially doubling what we had before.

rest seems to make sense, should send this to Greg when queue opens and we finalise it, just to see his reaction, 45K Calories is still a lot considerring Olympic athlete is quarter that, but i guess it validates him continuously eating/