Board Thread:Episodic and Issue Discussion/@comment-47881-20121008012726/@comment-1895174-20121013050055

Regulus22 wrote:

LoveWaffle wrote:

Regulus22 wrote:

LoveWaffle wrote: A legal separation is something granted after a period of separation, so Cheshire wouldn't really have to do anything to get one. Also, Tibet is part of China. but the govt. would only know they're together or seperated if they were informed. She;s a known criminal, it's not as though they're going to walk into whatever they do in america to keep tabs on relationships, she'd be arrested, he'd be held as a person of interest to try and find her/get info on her.

Really? I'd always thought Tibet was it's own country. Regardless, they're still separated, as per Cheshire's own words. The only way they wouldn't be is if they followed up that mission with something inappropriate for a kids' show.

And despite the Tibetan people's best efforts, it is not. Weren't here words more "Im still your wife"?

huh, well geography and apparently politics are clearly not my strong suit lol. If it's any consolation their efforts worked to my knowledge (I knew they had issues due to simpsons but I thought they were more like a extension (though still own country) cause of proximity to such a major one, similar to cuba or new zealand. 1. Again, divorce and separation are different. A married couple that are separated (but not divorced) are still married to each other.

2. Cuba and New Zealand are not extensions of a major country. They're independent. Although not by any means a perfect comparison, Tibet's similar to Puerto Rico - it's a part of a country with significant autonomy.

Damn did we get off-topic.