Board Thread:Young Justice News/@comment-34954086-20130506143410/@comment-5161988-20130517142039

Well, since you responded indirectly to what I said, I may as well clarify in kind. I disagree that this was a "misjudgment without legitimate proof" and that Regulus made "baseless assumptions" upon the situation.

From what I've seen, he isn't an unreasonable person, and illegitimacy on the part of SMGO is a perfectly valid deduction that one could make given the consistent lack of clarity upon important aspects of their campaign - as well as the points that they were not given the OK by Warner Bros. but proceeded anyway, made some questionable decisions in the start up to their crowd-funding endeavor, and were virtually an unknown Internet entity to most fans before their announcements to back what seemed (and still does seem) to be an impossible undertaking.

If SMGO turn out to be legitimate, it was a "misjudgement" but not one made without good reason - as such, his prior criticism, however staunch, still stands, and that does not, in my books, warrant an apology... Especially when he has more or less agreed to endorse the project upon a statement from PayPal.