Board Thread:Young Justice News/@comment-47881-20130128165351/@comment-1895174-20130323031240


 * 1) Then they're too late. The people who participated earlier, they knew what to do.
 * 2) You're third point was wrong.
 * 3) Just because a conclusion isn't satisfying doesn't make it less of a conclusion.
 * 4) For one, it isn't. Secondly, it isn't. See Regulus' post.
 * 5) For one, I'm not discarding or ignoring big plot points, nor am I underestimating the complexity of its plot. I just see it as conclusive, and I don't have to invent plots so I can view it otherwise. Actually, I enjoyed the episode more because I thought it could stand as a series finale. How am I cheapening the episode by enjoying it more? Secondly, of course Weisman won't view the second season finale as all that conclusive - he's the guy who has all the info on what he would have done with a third season he might never (and, by his own admission, probably won't) ever get to tell. He's the artist, and the artist is never finished with their work. As the audience who doesn't have access to that material, we have the luxury of seeing the finale in a more conclusive light. There's nothing else he has to say. I would love to see more, but if that more never comes, I'm more than satisfied with what we got.