Thread:Tupka217/@comment-908565-20121017175649/@comment-47881-20121018154544

Noneofyourbusiness wrote: My thinking is that the specific Roy who was the template is the one who is Arsenal, and should be distinguished from Red Arrow, to clarify which Roy he is and also to avoid the implication that Red Arrow is not a Roy (which one could especially get from Jim's infobox as it is). I think you're relying too much on the infobox and a purveyor of information. The very first sentence of Red Arrow's page is "Red Arrow (real name Roy Harper)". That should clarify any implication derived from the infobox, which I don't see how it could happen anyway, since Roy Harper is linked and all anyone has to do is click it to see who that Roy is.

Roy was not Arsenal when he was used as a genetic template for RA. It's that simple. Ferge. Seriously.