Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-47881-20130606101841/@comment-432124-20130608191403

Thailog wrote: Cari1994 wrote: Note that I said "if you don't want to". And "legitimate" and "realistic" are very strong words when it comes to choices on saving a show. All you said was, "If you don't want to support an initiative that has more chances of success than SMGO, you don't have too." And "legitimate" and "realistic" are not strong words; they're just apropos. Cari1994 wrote: And please do not put your quotes as disclaimers if they're not actually disclaimers. I'd ask you the same thing, when your "disclaimers" are misinformative. Cari1994 wrote: Mocking another person's quotes is not a good way of being an administrator of a wiki. Spare me the lecture and stick to the topic.


 * 1) I never said that exactly. You just put in those words according to what you assumed that I implied.

BTW, I showed that first link to SMGO on Facebook yesterday and asked them what they thought about it and this is what they said:

"...everyone is free to feel what they want. She doesn't like us, but she's never reached out to talk either.

I should also point out that fans asked to do the campaign this way. It doesn't really harm anyone - its a bunch of IOUs to show they want to bring something back, and fans have noted they're pretty flexible on the rewards parts (which is great). I'd hold it analogous to a petition with actual teeth right now."